We all now know that Russia has recently been intensively using its massive strategic bombers directly to mercilessly target Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure.

These destructive strategic aircraft have been continuously committed in the latest large-scale air strikes as well.

But these aircraft, which form the air leg of Russia’s nuclear triad, are no longer safe anywhere because of Ukraine’s growing long range drone attacks.

Faced with this rising asymmetric threat, the Russian command has been forced to move a large part of the fleet to main permanent bases such as Ukraine in the Amore region of the country’s far east.

According to open- source satellite analysis, this relocation has been one of the most extensive basing shifts seen in Russian strategic aviation since 2022.

Some TU16’s were even moved to Anadir in Chukotka next to Alaska and to Yellow Zoo on Kamchatka.

These bases in Arctic terrain such as Chukotka and Kamchatka take the aircraft completely out of Ukrainian range, but they also impose severe logistical obstacles because of extremely harsh climate conditions.

According to Osent data reported by the insider and Militari, these aircraft can still be used for direct strike missions from the distant bases.

Every sorty, however, requires thousands of extra kilm of flight and additional fuel load. Because of operational difficulties, these massive aircraft have to use areas relatively closer to the Ukrainian border, such as angles 2 and as preparation, that is staging bases.

And this is exactly where Russia’s biggest mistake begins. That is using its most important bombers in base areas such as Angles and Alenia that can themselves become targets.

These two critical military facilities serve as indispensable bridge heads where the aircraft are armed with heavy cruise missiles and have their technical preparations completed before launch.

When the mission order comes, the aircraft take off from the far east, fly thousands of kilometers, land at staging bases such as Angles 2, and there take on fuel and a load of KH101 cruise missiles.

The precise mounting of the missiles onto the aircrafts under fuselage and wing pylons with cranes can only be carried out with the specialized technical personnel and equipment found at fully equipped bases like Angles.

After completing preparations, the bombers take off again from these bases, proceed to launch areas over the Caspian Sea or Seratov airspace, fire their missiles, and then begin the long return journey.

Aircraft that cannot fly directly back to their home bases after launch usually have to land again at these preparation bases for technical inspection and flight data analysis.

In other words, for Russia’s strategy of bombing Ukraine from the air, the central heart of this entire logistics and launch chain is angle 2 military airfield in Saratov.

Ukrainian intelligence can now readily strike these crown jewels that Russia cannot replace, precisely in this most vulnerable preparation base area.

In fact, this situation is part of a much broader strategy in which Ukraine is systematically and steadily eroding Moscow’s Soviet era air power.

According to the latest striking data released by war tracking networks, Ukraine has so far succeeded in completely destroying at least 11 Tu95MS and seven Tu22 M3 strategic bombers.

Kev has even just carried out an astonishing historic operation on this score. Ukrainian planners spent months of meticulous intelligence tracking on the enemy’s unavoidable operational routine and forced pause points.

An 800 km range drone strike that completely punched through Russian air defense networks many kilome behind the front line hit angle’s military airfield in Saratov Oblast right in the heart.

This audacious and highly critical operation was carried out on the night of August 28th, 2026 by the elite Alpha Special Operations Unit of the Security Service of Ukraine.

The target was a Tu95MS strategic missile carrier that regularly reigns death on Ukrainian cities and forms the airleg of Russia’s nuclear triad.

These aircraft are also among the most critical platforms Russia has kept in the air since the Cold War, flying nuclear deterrence patrols along NATO borders.

The long range Ukrainian kamicazi drones that were launched flew a massive distance of about 800 km to reach these crown jewels.

Along the flight route, the coverage of Russian early warning radars was mapped so the drones could use terrain masking and skim at extremely low altitude.

According to Defense Express, the strike may have used MIC2000 type drones that outwardly resemble Iranian-made shot heads, but have Canard for planes, can carry a 60 kg warhead, and can reach a range of 2,000 km.

Thanks to the Canard design, these air vehicles gain high maneuverability and stability at low altitude and are also fitted with advanced onboard navigation modules against the signal jamming frequencies of Russian electronic warfare systems.

There were of course air defense systems and numerous obstacles along the drone’s route, but Russia’s vast territory and an air defense umbrella stretched too thin at the front mean that even the most critical strategic bases such as angles cannot be fully protected against this kind of airborne penetration.

In particular, the shift of short-range point defense systems such as Pancier and Tour mainly to the front line and around Crimea has left air bases in the interior almost unprotected open targets.

The drones therefore did not need to defeat the entire Russian air defense network one system at a time.

They only needed to survive long enough to reach one very important airfield. The Ukrainian kamicazi drone locked onto the target coordinates and made its final dive straight onto the strategic bomber parked in the open.

The results of the strike were for Russia a disaster in the full sense of the word.

In August 28th, satellite imagery published by AB Vector, Stratahichna Abiatsia, and Exalenova Plus, a substantial section of the right wing of the hit TU95MS is seen torn away.

Clear evidence released by OSEN analysis groups confirmed that this massive aircraft, its structural integrity completely broken, is now economically irreparable and no longer airworthy.

The scale of the operation that same night was not limited to this single aircraft.

Preliminary reports said ammunition and fuel storage at the base were also successfully hit. So what did Russia actually lose after these strikes?

Looking at the basic characteristics of the target that was hit, the TU95MS is a true cold war monster powered by four huge Samara Knetsov NK12MP turborop engines and possessing a 50 m wingspan.

Thanks to its counterrotating eightblade AV60N propellers, it can reach 830 km per hour, holding the title of the world’s fastest and most powerful turborop bomber.

These giants, with a maximum takeoff weight of about 185 tons, can conduct precision strikes from thousands of kilometers away with the KH101 and KH555 cruise missiles they carry on external pylons.

The KH55 nuclear missiles in the aircraft’s internal rotary launcher and the precision guided conventional munitions carried externally made it the Russian army’s most flexible long range fire platform.

However dangerous they may be in the air while parked on the ground, these aircraft could not escape becoming the target of an asymmetric drone costing only a few thousand.

The base area where the bomber sat was as critical as the aircraft itself. Engles 2 only 600 to 800 km from the Ukrainian border is the most critical and logistically best equipped launch hub of Russian strategic aviation on the European side.

This geographic position gives the aircraft the most favorable operational range for launching missiles toward Ukrainian airspace and returning as quickly as possible.

All the integrated infrastructure required for loading KH101 cruise missiles, maintenance and repair and basing of heavy tanker aircraft is concentrated at this air base.

The 184th heavy bomber regiment and the 121st guards heavy bomber regiment base there hold the personnel who form the backbone of the strategic nuclear forces.

Aware of this critical importance, Russia began the panicked construction of at least 17 massive hangers at Angles 2 after the major drone attacks of 2025.

Protection projects previously submitted to Russian Defense Minister Andre Belalusovv planned reinforced tent structures measuring 65x 60 m and fitted with automatic fire suppression systems.

When completed, these giant shelters were designed to protect up to 18 TU160M supersonic bombers and according to various estimates, 51 to 55 TU95MS aircraft from openair drone threats.

Such capacity would have meant hiding roughly 25% of Russia’s entire active strategic bomber fleet behind steel and concrete shields at a single base.

But slow construction progress and the fact that the strategic bombers still had to wait on open aprons for missions gave Ukraine the perfect strike opportunity it was looking for.

Satellite intelligence had clearly identified two TU160s and two TU95MS bombers sitting unprotected on the apron because the hangers were not yet finished.

Ukrainian intelligence knows very well that wearing down these aircraft with attacks on the staging bases means drying up at the source the missiles that would otherwise fall on the front line or on Kev.

Trying to shoot a missile down in the air with a Patriot costs millions of dollars in air defense missiles.

While destroying the aircraft that would launch the missile on the ground eliminates the source of the attack directly.

This operation was not the first aircraft the SBU has targeted at Angles in recent months.

In a similar strike on the night of July 17th, the tail section of another TU95MS was completely torn off and the aircraft turned into wreckage.

The other bomber that lost its rear turret and vertical stabilizer in the July blow, just like this latest aircraft, was being used for training and operational readiness flights.

After these successive heavy losses, the biggest question in people’s minds is how many operational TU95 bombers Russia still has left.

According to data from Ukrainian defense intelligence, only a few days before the strike, Russia had 38 combat ready TU95MS/MS aircraft in service.

After the latest successful operation at Engles, that number is estimated to have fallen to 37 combat ready aircraft.

For a state claiming to be a vast air power like Russia, that figure means alarm bells are ringing.

Separate from GUR’s ready figure of 38, aviation expert Costentin Kolap said in July 2026 that the number of TU95s Russia regularly puts on sort might be around 12.

That estimate describes the gap between aircraft that appear in inventory and aircraft that actually fly continuously.

On paper, the Russian aerospace forces inventory shows more aircraft, but at least 10 of them are thought to be unable to perform combat missions because of metal fatigue and parts shortages.

These aircraft are generally kept in hangers and used as donor aircraft to supply spare parts to other operational airframes.

The most punishing aspect of these losses is that Russia’s active TU95MS production line closed decades ago and cannot replace each aircraft that is hit because the production equipment at the Avia plant in Samara was completely dismantled in the early 1990s.

Manufacturing a new airframe is technically impossible. Russia cannibalize damaged aircraft by stripping parts from other wrecks or try to repair them with welding machines, but their chance of producing a brand new TU95MS from scratch is almost non-existent.

Therefore, every TU95 bomber that burns on the ground creates an irreversible and permanent drop in Russia’s future cruise missile launch capacity against Ukraine.

So, can Russia prevent these bombers from becoming targets from now on? The only solution was, as mentioned at the outset, to flee these aircraft farther away.

But moving the fleet to Ukraine air base in the Ammer region, 8,000 km to the east, brought Russia an unimaginable logistics and engineering nightmare as well.

Because those Far East bases were not designed for such intensive sorty rates and lacked the rail logistics needed for the constant resupply of heavy missiles.

A standard TU95MS taking off from Ukra to attack any target in Ukraine now has to cover a full 12,000 km roundtrip distance on every sorty.

While covering that enormous distance, the aircraft have to cross Siberia, plan routes through multiple airspaces, and manage extreme fuel consumption.

For these massive aircraft forced to make a mandatory stop at angles 2 or Elenia before the mission, firing the missiles and returning to base now requires an estimated 23 hours of uninterrupted flight that exhausts the crew.

Spending that long in a cramped, noisy cockpit pushes the physical and mental endurance of pilots and navigators to the limit.

This extraordinary distance also creates deadly mechanical wear on airframes already worn by decades of service and on the KNET NK12MP engines.

Overheating of the turborop engines, micro cracks in propeller shafts, and hydraulic pressure losses have become the most common technical failures after these flights.

Given that the engine’s operational life is only 5,000 hours, the 23 hours spent in the air on each mission means the aircraft’s annual flight limits are completely used up after only eight or nine sorties.

Maintenance intervals for these monsters, whose airframe overhaul costs $50 million per aircraft, have narrowed dangerously because of the excessive flight hours.

The situation has also multiplied the economic bill of the war, driving operating costs that used to average $100,000 per flight up to a massive $500,000 per sordi.

Every extra hour the aircraft stay in the air opens a huge logistics hole in the Russian Defense Ministry budget and also consumes the tanker aircraft fleet.

Stressed mechanical systems have already begun to fail. According to reliable intelligence reports, many bombers have had to return to base without launching their missiles because of faults in the release mechanism.

Military leak channels such as dossier have documented a TU160 whose launch mechanism locked and could not release its munitions in recent months and another that could not take off because of an engine failure.

The irony standing in plain sight lays bare one of the most striking asymmetric contradictions in modern military history.

Strategic bombers as massive as the TU95MS went through decades of design and testing to withstand huge nuclear clashes between superpowers during the Cold War.

These aircraft were built with titanium and duralumin airframes to launch intercontinental nuclear missiles in a third world war, survive a nuclear fallout environment, and cross oceans.

These giants were specifically conceived to patrol the edges of enemy airspace with nuclear warheads and to execute a scenario of global destruction.

Today, the Russian army’s biggest headache is not cinematic missile delu or advanced stealth aircraft, but a relatively cheap propeller-driven kamicazi drone launched from hundreds of kilometers away.

A simple unmanned vehicle with a composite airframe whose cost does not even reach a million dollars destroys on the spot a strategic deterrent asset worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

There is no dog fight, no air combat. Massive air defense batteries and advanced radar networks cannot stop that simple drone from reaching a runway and destroying a very expensive aircraft.

The massive bomber waiting helplessly in line on the tarmac is hunted like an openair museum target in the face of modern asymmetric warfare tactics.

Someone in the corridors of the Russian Defense Ministry is probably looking at that missing wing section in the satellite imagery and asking in helplessness, how many more of these do we have left?

The strategic reports being issued paint a darker picture every day and show that the air leg of the nuclear triad is melting rapidly.

One of the most striking details is that this irreplaceable strategic nuclear bomber fleet continues to shrink steadily day after day.

Each loss shakes not only today’s war in Ukraine, but also the global military balances Russia will have to maintain for the next 20 years.

Russia is forced to make a deadly choice between protecting these irreplaceable strategic assets and continuing missile attacks on Ukraine.

Fleeing to the Far East wears the aircraft out and burns through their mechanical life while bringing them to staging bases near the front turns them into open targets for Ukrainian drones.

So, what do you think about this? Can Russia keep up missile strikes on Ukraine while risking the complete loss of the strategic bomber fleet that is shrinking and for which spare parts are no longer even available?

Will Ukraine’s asymmetric drone technology succeed in permanently throwing cold war aviation doctrines worth trillions of dollars onto the scrap heap?

We look forward to your comments. To make long journeys more enjoyable, we also invite you to Spotify where we present our video content.

Thank you for choosing us. Presented by TGN.